[Techtalk] Debian versus GenToo
Terri Oda
terri at zone12.com
Tue Sep 21 00:47:42 EST 2004
On Sep 20, 2004, at 11:44 PM, Beth Skwarecki wrote:
> Testing is a sort of special beast. It doesn't have the newest stuff,
> it
> isn't the stablest, and in fact it's more of a security risk than the
> others. I only recommend it to people who (a) are behind a good
> firewall,
> and (b) want to be able to use the testing installer but don't feel
> ready
> for unstable.
Well, testing, in my experience, is 99% or more stable, but allows you
to use stuff that's beyond stable. When I started using debian stable
was *ancient*, testing was the only reasonable option for the machine I
did most of my development on, since I needed quite a bit of newer
stuff (development tools, drivers, etc.), but it needed to not break on
upgrade 'cause I didn't have time to deal with it, and I only really
had the one machine that was under my control, so it would have blocked
me from working to have it down. Nowadays, stable might be more
reasonable (as long as you upgrade a few things), as it's not quite so
far behind the curve.
Truth be told, though, I haven't tried unstable -- how unstable is it
really?
Terri
More information about the Techtalk
mailing list